Caleb Crain sums up the MSMer's Media 2.0 anxiety : Neuron Culture

Search

Profile

I write on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications. (Find clips here.) Right now I'm writing my fourth book, The Orchid and the Dandelion, which explores the hypothesis that the genetic roots some of our worst problems and traits — depresison, hyperaggression, violence, antisocial behavior — can also give rise to resilience, cooperation, empathy, and contentment. The book expands on my December 2009 Atlantic article exploring these ideas. I've also written three books, including Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career — an elemental dispute running some 75 years.

If you'd like, you can subscribe to Neuron Culture by email. You might also want to see more of my work at my main website or check out my Tumblr log.

My Google Shared links

Caleb Crain sums up the MSMer's Media 2.0 anxiety

Posted on: September 21, 2009 2:23 PM, by David Dobbs

In the intro to his self-published (on Lulu.com) collection of blog posts, The Wreck of the Henry Clay, New Yorker contributor Caleb Crain sums up nicely the anxieties shared by at least one other writer-with-blogging-addon about blogging, and, by extension, about self-publishing books. Which I may just do myself soon -- a collection -- because I CAN. Ellipses are mine.

I came to blogging ... as a veteran of print.... [and so] came to blogging nervous about losing what footing I had there... The quandary: If I wanted to communicate an important discovery, shouldn't I write it up formally, either for money (i.e., journalism) or prestige( scholarship)? If a discover wasn't worth these rewards, was a casual communication of it worth risking my reputation, such as it was, for accuracy and deliberation?... To speculate beyond one's area of expertise, based on no more than intuition and a few pieces of evidence, which happened to be new to oneself but not might be to specialists -- wasn't that a recipe for broadcasting one's ignorance? And at the pit of my stomach, as I contemplated my efforts to make a living as a freelancer, lay another question: Would my editors continue to buy the cow if I was dispensing the milk for free on my blog?

This last question, Crain notes, turns out to be a good one.

Do check this out.

Posted via web from David Dobbs's Somatic Marker

Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science

Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/120483

Comments

But does he answer that question? Certainly there is a fine line between getting significant utility out of a blog - building your personal brand, scratching an itch that your regular writing doesn't - and getting used by a blog, whether or not that blog contributes to someone else's bottom line (like Scienceblogs) or doesn't (if you're blogging on your own). I would have liked to hear more about *your* views on this subject.

You'll notice that my own blog isn't one, really. But on the other hand I can't resist the social bookmarking service that is twitter. So perhaps I'm no less guilty of frittering away what could be paid time!

Posted by: Christopher Mims | September 21, 2009 2:46 PM